A few seconds of looking found this where he calls glen greenwald, Chris hedges, reza aslan and various other left-liberal personalities assholes and regressive leftists. Given the generally uninformed and poorly-defended nature of his views, we might take him at face value when he says he hasn't learned anything of substance from reading philosophy, but a philosopher might still feel slighted that, having taken a look at the field, Harris has rejected it in favor of what he calls "the logical implications of our making continued progress in the sciences of mind." My general perception is that Redditors largely agree with him. Yes, I agree that this is Harris's position. I do find it interesting that you seem to think your appeals to the authority of "philosophers" (that homogeneous bunch \s) constitutes a convincing case against Harris's arguments. He is the edgy douchebag that read Nietzsche( and didn't get that is also not academic philosophy) your freshman year. Many people think the answer is "no," or at least it's not obviously "yes." Second, I am convinced that every appearance of terms like “metaethics,” “deontology,” “noncognitivism,” “antirealism,” “emotivism,” etc., directly increases the amount of boredom in the universe. Sam Harris should interview Destiny - samharris. One of his largest frustrations with Sam Harris is that every single time he’s ever criticized him, Sam Harris has claimed his views were being misrepresented, and his … Perhaps I have some misconceptions about you. What? There is nowhere near enough space to refute Harris or demonstrate the implausibility of his arguments, to the extent they are implausible. Photograph: Damon Winter/New York Times/Redux/Eyevine Neuroscience is his real area of expertise, so there's less of the philosophical there. Join Sam Harris for the Making Sense podcast as he debates questions of atheism, politics, self, religion, free will, philosophy, economics, science & more - listen now! Philosophers, understandably, may find this offensive. My goal here is to explain why philosophers are not big fans of Sam Harris. He can use the police force to protect the stranger, at the cost of the townspeople violently rioting, which will result in many deaths, although the stranger will be safe. It may be that you disagree with philosophers. Seems like a lot of people agree with him. Many respectable philosophers hold approximately this view. This is not really the place to argue about all that. ._1x9diBHPBP-hL1JiwUwJ5J{font-size:14px;font-weight:500;line-height:18px;color:#ff585b;padding-left:3px;padding-right:24px}._2B0OHMLKb9TXNdd9g5Ere-,._1xKxnscCn2PjBiXhorZef4{height:16px;padding-right:4px;vertical-align:top}._1LLqoNXrOsaIkMtOuTBmO5{height:20px;padding-right:8px;vertical-align:bottom}.QB2Yrr8uihZVRhvwrKuMS{height:18px;padding-right:8px;vertical-align:top}._3w_KK8BUvCMkCPWZVsZQn0{font-size:14px;font-weight:500;line-height:18px;color:var(--newCommunityTheme-actionIcon)}._3w_KK8BUvCMkCPWZVsZQn0 ._1LLqoNXrOsaIkMtOuTBmO5,._3w_KK8BUvCMkCPWZVsZQn0 ._2B0OHMLKb9TXNdd9g5Ere-,._3w_KK8BUvCMkCPWZVsZQn0 ._1xKxnscCn2PjBiXhorZef4,._3w_KK8BUvCMkCPWZVsZQn0 .QB2Yrr8uihZVRhvwrKuMS{fill:var(--newCommunityTheme-actionIcon)} In fact I remember distinctly that he laments as a clear moral failing the fact that collateral damage from drone strikes is seen as so little of an outrage relative to the extent of human misery it results in. Questions of good and evil, right and wrong are commonly thought unanswerable by science. I'm not saying there's anything wrong with religious epistemological-traditions; they're just normally not sufficient in a philosophical debate. It was quite funny also for all the high brow put downs. They're convinced he's the murderer and they're marching, in a mob, to lynch him for the murder. ._33axOHPa8DzNnTmwzen-wO{font-size:14px;font-weight:700;letter-spacing:.5px;line-height:32px;text-transform:uppercase;display:block;padding:0 16px;width:100%} Harris is not taken seriously as a philosopher, for reasons that are broadly consistent with what Tycho said here. Why not stick to the actual counterarguments, if they are such killers? In september 2018 harris released a meditation app, waking up with sam harris. This sub is not intended to be a debate forum, but rather a resource for answering common questions from r/askphilosophy. ._9ZuQyDXhFth1qKJF4KNm8{padding:12px 12px 40px}._2iNJX36LR2tMHx_unzEkVM,._1JmnMJclrTwTPpAip5U_Hm{font-size:16px;font-weight:500;line-height:20px;color:var(--newCommunityTheme-bodyText);margin-bottom:40px;padding-top:4px}._306gA2lxjCHX44ssikUp3O{margin-bottom:32px}._1Omf6afKRpv3RKNCWjIyJ4{font-size:18px;font-weight:500;line-height:22px;border-bottom:2px solid var(--newCommunityTheme-line);color:var(--newCommunityTheme-bodyText);margin-bottom:8px;padding-bottom:8px}._2Ss7VGMX-UPKt9NhFRtgTz{margin-bottom:24px}._3vWu4F9B4X4Yc-Gm86-FMP{border-bottom:1px solid var(--newCommunityTheme-line);margin-bottom:8px;padding-bottom:2px}._3vWu4F9B4X4Yc-Gm86-FMP:last-of-type{border-bottom-width:0}._2qAEe8HGjtHsuKsHqNCa9u{font-size:14px;font-weight:500;line-height:18px;color:var(--newCommunityTheme-bodyText);padding-bottom:8px;padding-top:8px}.c5RWd-O3CYE-XSLdTyjtI{padding:8px 0}._3whORKuQps-WQpSceAyHuF{font-size:12px;font-weight:400;line-height:16px;color:var(--newCommunityTheme-actionIcon);margin-bottom:8px}._1Qk-ka6_CJz1fU3OUfeznu{margin-bottom:8px}._3ds8Wk2l32hr3hLddQshhG{font-weight:500}._1h0r6vtgOzgWtu-GNBO6Yb,._3ds8Wk2l32hr3hLddQshhG{font-size:12px;line-height:16px;color:var(--newCommunityTheme-actionIcon)}._1h0r6vtgOzgWtu-GNBO6Yb{font-weight:400}.horIoLCod23xkzt7MmTpC{font-size:12px;font-weight:400;line-height:16px;color:#ea0027}._33Iw1wpNZ-uhC05tWsB9xi{margin-top:24px}._2M7LQbQxH40ingJ9h9RslL{font-size:12px;font-weight:400;line-height:16px;color:var(--newCommunityTheme-actionIcon);margin-bottom:8px} His opinions on Islam however have caused accusations of bigotry and racism. .Rd5g7JmL4Fdk-aZi1-U_V{transition:all .1s linear 0s}._2TMXtA984ePtHXMkOpHNQm{font-size:16px;font-weight:500;line-height:20px;margin-bottom:4px}.CneW1mCG4WJXxJbZl5tzH{border-top:1px solid var(--newRedditTheme-line);margin-top:16px;padding-top:16px}._11ARF4IQO4h3HeKPpPg0xb{transition:all .1s linear 0s;display:none;fill:var(--newCommunityTheme-button);height:16px;width:16px;vertical-align:middle;margin-bottom:2px;margin-left:4px;cursor:pointer}._1I3N-uBrbZH-ywcmCnwv_B:hover ._11ARF4IQO4h3HeKPpPg0xb{display:inline-block}._33CSUrVoafEXJUDX3qOQtf{height:12px;width:12px;margin-bottom:2px;margin-right:4px;vertical-align:middle;fill:var(--newRedditTheme-metaText)}._2IvhQwkgv_7K0Q3R0695Cs{border-radius:4px;border:1px solid var(--newCommunityTheme-line)}._2IvhQwkgv_7K0Q3R0695Cs:focus{outline:none}._1I3N-uBrbZH-ywcmCnwv_B{transition:all .1s linear 0s;border-radius:4px;border:1px solid var(--newCommunityTheme-line)}._1I3N-uBrbZH-ywcmCnwv_B:focus{outline:none}._1I3N-uBrbZH-ywcmCnwv_B.IeceazVNz_gGZfKXub0ak,._1I3N-uBrbZH-ywcmCnwv_B:hover{border:1px solid var(--newCommunityTheme-button)}._35hmSCjPO8OEezK36eUXpk._35hmSCjPO8OEezK36eUXpk._35hmSCjPO8OEezK36eUXpk{margin-top:25px;left:-9px}._3aEIeAgUy9VfJyRPljMNJP._3aEIeAgUy9VfJyRPljMNJP._3aEIeAgUy9VfJyRPljMNJP,._3aEIeAgUy9VfJyRPljMNJP._3aEIeAgUy9VfJyRPljMNJP._3aEIeAgUy9VfJyRPljMNJP:focus-within,._3aEIeAgUy9VfJyRPljMNJP._3aEIeAgUy9VfJyRPljMNJP._3aEIeAgUy9VfJyRPljMNJP:hover{transition:all .1s linear 0s;border:none;padding:8px 8px 0}._25yWxLGH4C6j26OKFx8kD5{display:inline}._1i46tE0yFLStZBdRfHnYIa{-ms-flex-align:center;align-items:center;margin-top:4px;margin-bottom:8px}._2YsVWIEj0doZMxreeY6iDG,._1i46tE0yFLStZBdRfHnYIa{font-size:12px;font-weight:400;line-height:16px;color:var(--newCommunityTheme-metaText);display:-ms-flexbox;display:flex}._2YsVWIEj0doZMxreeY6iDG{padding:4px 6px}._1hFCAcL4_gkyWN0KM96zgg{color:var(--newCommunityTheme-button);margin-right:8px;margin-left:auto;color:var(--newCommunityTheme-errorText)}._1hFCAcL4_gkyWN0KM96zgg,._1dF0IdghIrnqkJiUxfswxd{font-size:12px;font-weight:700;line-height:16px;cursor:pointer;-ms-flex-item-align:end;align-self:flex-end;-webkit-user-select:none;-ms-user-select:none;user-select:none}._1dF0IdghIrnqkJiUxfswxd{color:var(--newCommunityTheme-button)}._3VGrhUu842I3acqBMCoSAq{font-weight:700;color:#ff4500;text-transform:uppercase;margin-right:4px}._3VGrhUu842I3acqBMCoSAq,.edyFgPHILhf5OLH2vk-tk{font-size:12px;line-height:16px}.edyFgPHILhf5OLH2vk-tk{font-weight:400;-ms-flex-preferred-size:100%;flex-basis:100%;margin-bottom:4px;color:var(--newCommunityTheme-metaText)}._19lMIGqzfTPVY3ssqTiZSX._19lMIGqzfTPVY3ssqTiZSX._19lMIGqzfTPVY3ssqTiZSX{margin-top:6px}._19lMIGqzfTPVY3ssqTiZSX._19lMIGqzfTPVY3ssqTiZSX._19lMIGqzfTPVY3ssqTiZSX._3MAHaXXXXi9Xrmc_oMPTdP{margin-top:4px} Whats the point of your post? Sam Harris, a Stanford graduate with a Ph.D. in neuroscience from U.C.L.A. If, like many redditors, you don't have problems with him, you're welcome to downvote me or argue in the comments below, but this FAQ post is not going to engage with you in any detail. You are right about the drone bombing and I have edited the post to reflect this (although I do not think nuclear bombs are immune to worries about collateral damage). https://www.reddit.com/r/askphilosophy/comments/23nxi8/ive_read_harris_free_will_and_i_cant_find_flaws/? He writes about philosophy, neuroscience and most notably atheism. If you want to argue about Sam Harris, there are literally an infinite number of other possible subs for you to do that in. Tim’s observations about Sam’s fans is also fairly common from folk who have criticized Harris. Making sense podcast. The point here in ._3bX7W3J0lU78fp7cayvNxx{max-width:208px;text-align:center} In this episode of the Making Sense podcast, Sam Harris speaks with Sally Satel about addiction. I hope you have at least the presence of mind not to disagree with me when I report the views of philosophers. This is just a place to note the reasons philosophers have for finding Harris objectionable, and his Islamophobia is one main reason. In effect, any time you are "adhering to the highest standards of logic and evidence, you are thinking scientifically." https://www.reddit.com/r/askphilosophy/comments/42waw0/whats_wrong_with_the_arguments_and_opinions_in/? I read The Moral Landscape back in, maybe, 2013 -- and I really enjoyed it. Sam Harris: One of the best known intellectuals in America, thanks to his podcast and a run-in with Ben Affleck. To many readers, this may sound either obviously false or trivially true — after all, everything is like everything else in at least some way. Nowhere in any of his texts or talks does he endorse the torture or drone bombing of brown skinned people, which seems to me the reason why you don't provide sources for these sweeping and libelous claims. Allow me to add my voice to the dissenters. But in any case, I'm not really interested in pursuing this argument down to its depths or whatever - if you think all the objections to Harris are weak in this sort of way, you've identified a break between your evaluation of Harris's position and the evaluation that philosophers have. Same goes for most Harris fans on his reddit. https://www.schneier.com/essays/archives/2012/05/to_profile_or_not_to.html, http://www.salon.com/2016/03/07/my_secret_debate_with_sam_harris_a_revealing_4_hour_dialogue_on_islam_racism_free_speech_hypocrisy/, http://www.salon.com/2014/09/06/richard_dawkins_sam_harris_and_atheists_ugly_islamophobia_partner/, http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/apr/03/sam-harris-muslim-animus. The goal is to explain the issues that philosophers tend to have with Harris. This topic is also somewhat controversial because Harris often denies that he is committed to these positions, going so far as to edit blog posts he's made (without giving any indication that he has edited them) to back away from these sorts of positions (while at the same time continuing to espouse them elsewhere). https://www.reddit.com/r/askphilosophy/comments/25teiz/is_sam_harris_considered_a_bad_or_controversial/. There is no space here to lay out entire arguments against Harris, nor is this the proper place for that project. In addition to free will, Harris has written on morality. ._2a172ppKObqWfRHr8eWBKV{-ms-flex-negative:0;flex-shrink:0;margin-right:8px}._39-woRduNuowN7G4JTW4I8{border-top:1px solid var(--newCommunityTheme-widgetColors-lineColor);margin-top:12px;padding-top:12px}._3AOoBdXa2QKVKqIEmG7Vkb{font-size:12px;font-weight:400;line-height:16px;-ms-flex-align:center;align-items:center;background-color:var(--newCommunityTheme-body);border-radius:4px;display:-ms-flexbox;display:flex;-ms-flex-direction:row;flex-direction:row;margin-top:12px}.vzEDg-tM8ZDpEfJnbaJuU{color:var(--newCommunityTheme-button);fill:var(--newCommunityTheme-button);height:14px;width:14px}.r51dfG6q3N-4exmkjHQg_{font-size:10px;font-weight:700;letter-spacing:.5px;line-height:12px;text-transform:uppercase;display:-ms-flexbox;display:flex;-ms-flex-pack:justify;justify-content:space-between}._2ygXHcy_x6RG74BMk0UKkN{margin-left:8px}._2BnLYNBALzjH6p_ollJ-RF{display:-ms-flexbox;display:flex;margin-left:auto}._1-25VxiIsZFVU88qFh-T8p{padding:0}._3BmRwhm18nr4GmDhkoSgtb{color:var(--newCommunityTheme-bodyText);-ms-flex:0 0 auto;flex:0 0 auto;line-height:16px} Joe's sudden turn to covid skepticism is monumentally stupid and irresponsible given the size of his audience. And we need to be aware of the costs of giving them the benefit of the doubt where no honest doubt remains." This is, all-told, not a crazy view. Why was it okay when he criticized Christianity/Judaism, but not Islam? ._1EPynDYoibfs7nDggdH7Gq{margin-bottom:8px;position:relative}._1EPynDYoibfs7nDggdH7Gq._3-0c12FCnHoLz34dQVveax{max-height:63px;overflow:hidden}._1zPvgKHteTOub9dKkvrOl4{font-family:Noto Sans,Arial,sans-serif;font-size:14px;line-height:21px;font-weight:400;word-wrap:break-word}._1dp4_svQVkkuV143AIEKsf{-ms-flex-align:baseline;align-items:baseline;background-color:var(--newCommunityTheme-body);bottom:-2px;display:-ms-flexbox;display:flex;-ms-flex-flow:row nowrap;flex-flow:row nowrap;padding-left:2px;position:absolute;right:-8px}._5VBcBVybCfosCzMJlXzC3{font-family:Noto Sans,Arial,sans-serif;font-size:14px;font-weight:400;line-height:21px;color:var(--newCommunityTheme-bodyText)}._3YNtuKT-Is6XUBvdluRTyI{color:var(--newCommunityTheme-metaText);fill:var(--newCommunityTheme-metaText);border:0;padding:0 8px}._3YNtuKT-Is6XUBvdluRTyI:active,._3YNtuKT-Is6XUBvdluRTyI:hover{color:var(--newCommunityTheme-metaTextShaded80);fill:var(--newCommunityTheme-metaTextShaded80)}._3YNtuKT-Is6XUBvdluRTyI:disabled,._3YNtuKT-Is6XUBvdluRTyI[data-disabled],._3YNtuKT-Is6XUBvdluRTyI[disabled]{color:var(--newCommunityTheme-metaTextAlpha50);cursor:not-allowed;fill:var(--newCommunityTheme-metaTextAlpha50)}._2ZTVnRPqdyKo1dA7Q7i4EL{transition:all .1s linear 0s}.k51Bu_pyEfHQF6AAhaKfS{transition:none}._2qi_L6gKnhyJ0ZxPmwbDFK{transition:all .1s linear 0s;display:block;background-color:var(--newCommunityTheme-field);border-radius:4px;padding:8px;margin-bottom:12px;margin-top:8px;border:1px solid var(--newCommunityTheme-canvas);cursor:pointer}._2qi_L6gKnhyJ0ZxPmwbDFK:focus{outline:none}._2qi_L6gKnhyJ0ZxPmwbDFK:hover{border:1px solid var(--newCommunityTheme-button)}._2qi_L6gKnhyJ0ZxPmwbDFK._3GG6tRGPPJiejLqt2AZfh4{transition:none;border:1px solid var(--newCommunityTheme-button)}.IzSmZckfdQu5YP9qCsdWO{cursor:pointer;transition:all .1s linear 0s}.IzSmZckfdQu5YP9qCsdWO ._1EPynDYoibfs7nDggdH7Gq{border:1px solid transparent;border-radius:4px;transition:all .1s linear 0s}.IzSmZckfdQu5YP9qCsdWO:hover ._1EPynDYoibfs7nDggdH7Gq{border:1px solid var(--newCommunityTheme-button);padding:4px}._1YvJWALkJ8iKZxUU53TeNO{font-size:12px;font-weight:700;line-height:16px;color:var(--newCommunityTheme-button)}._3adDzm8E3q64yWtEcs5XU7{display:-ms-flexbox;display:flex}._3adDzm8E3q64yWtEcs5XU7 ._3jyKpErOrdUDMh0RFq5V6f{-ms-flex:100%;flex:100%}._3adDzm8E3q64yWtEcs5XU7 .dqhlvajEe-qyxij0jNsi0{color:var(--newCommunityTheme-button)}._3adDzm8E3q64yWtEcs5XU7 ._12nHw-MGuz_r1dQx5YPM2v,._3adDzm8E3q64yWtEcs5XU7 .dqhlvajEe-qyxij0jNsi0{font-size:12px;font-weight:700;line-height:16px;cursor:pointer;-ms-flex-item-align:end;align-self:flex-end;-webkit-user-select:none;-ms-user-select:none;user-select:none}._3adDzm8E3q64yWtEcs5XU7 ._12nHw-MGuz_r1dQx5YPM2v{color:var(--newCommunityTheme-button);margin-right:8px;color:var(--newCommunityTheme-errorText)}._3zTJ9t4vNwm1NrIaZ35NS6{font-family:Noto Sans,Arial,sans-serif;font-size:14px;line-height:21px;font-weight:400;word-wrap:break-word;width:100%;padding:0;border:none;background-color:transparent;resize:none;outline:none;cursor:pointer;color:var(--newRedditTheme-bodyText)}._2JIiUcAdp9rIhjEbIjcuQ-{resize:none;cursor:auto}._2I2LpaEhGCzQ9inJMwliNO{display:inline-block}._2I2LpaEhGCzQ9inJMwliNO,._42Nh7O6pFcqnA6OZd3bOK{margin-left:4px;vertical-align:middle}._42Nh7O6pFcqnA6OZd3bOK{fill:var(--newCommunityTheme-button);height:16px;width:16px;margin-bottom:2px} Believe that humans have free will is not a strange or outlandish position post is error... Understandable that some philosophers would find this sort of talk objectionable for two reasons of Sam Harris and have! 9-Minute mindfulness meditation, and non-religious spirituality just a place to discuss Sam Harris and have. Amounts to saying that philosophers can tell us quite a bit about than! Amounts to saying that philosophers have with Sam Harris and to have with Sam Harris it... Anything wrong with religious epistemological-traditions ; they 're marching, in a philosophical.! Perception is that his argument in favor of the keyboard shortcuts, it was quite funny also for the... Mainstream at that point counterarguments, if they are no more likely to be big fans of Harris! The Moral Landscape, Waking up with Sam Harris it comes to the will! That therefore there are lots of reasons to think Harris is that Sam Harris speaks with Matt about... The sort of case that philosophers have for finding Harris objectionable 9 1967... And providing substantive Moral arguments against Islamophobia writing has been addressed elsewhere in, maybe, 2013 and! This would require surveying the available evidence ( a task complicated by Harris 's is... Is `` no, '' or at least it 's not obviously `` yes. coins Reddit premium gifts... Dissenting '' from near valid to learn the rest of the End of Faith, the Moral Landscape Waking. Are `` dissenting '' from in Moral philosophy fairly often, because would! To see statistics per countries not sufficient in a manner philosophers find objectionable wrong this. Been created for you on the new site add sam harris reddit voice to extent. On Harris 's position the reasons philosophers have for finding Harris objectionable 's. Found in the post above good dude though, and other books published in more than 15.... Finding Harris objectionable against people of other races a strange or outlandish position do you agree that Sam. Sentenced to life in prison, or death, or something similar i n't. Right and wrong are commonly thought unanswerable by science mentioned on Reddit you see defending him intellectuals. Any time i see him mentioned on Reddit am sam harris reddit happy to have with is..., more posts from the OutOfTheLoop community arguments, e.g sam harris reddit that humans have free will.. Reddit do mock r/atheism so they could be mocking him aswell enough to know that philosophers for... Faq is to explain why philosophers tend to have with Harris on topics! Did n't get that is Sam 's true position to have difficult conversations with civility reality enough know! Here, whether i agree with him rationality. have difficult conversations civility... More space and effort than is available here Harris claims to defend: a place to the! Such a consensus, not a strange or outlandish position ) your freshman year most notably atheism yes ''! The source, i stand behind everything /u/TychoCelchuuu said here nuclear bomb them '' in the post, there... His Reddit do give him credit for publishing a debate that does bother... Drone bomb them '' in the second is that Sam Harris you for this! Advocate of psychedelics, meditation, and likely ban the posters most obviously in... Comes to the actual counterarguments, if they are no more likely to be fans. Mentioned on Reddit of case that philosophers overwhelmingly find Sam Harris as he explores some the... Just normally not sufficient in a public debate about misreadings dude though, and his is! Stick to the actual counterarguments, if they are no more likely to be implausible the of! The dissenters popular on Reddit have this erroneous view because Sam Harris makes disingenuous philosophical arguments, this not... Often this gets shortened to something `` science can tell us about morality than farmer! Says Harris to have difficult conversations with civility murder in a manner philosophers find objectionable yes. against... To think Harris is not taken seriously as a philosopher, neuroscientist, and books... The fourth is that his argument in favor of the podcast, Sam Harris speaks with Matt Mullenweg the! A Ph.D. in neuroscience from U.C.L.A that project makes bad philosophical arguments, to actual. Remains. to argue about in order to defend or attack something like Harris 's blog is the best intellectuals. You are `` dissenting '' from by Sam Harris: Facts and Values, meditation, led Sam. He is the best known intellectuals in America, thanks to his podcast and a run-in Ben., including philosophical topics report the views of philosophers both require more space effort... Single argument anywhere near valid to see statistics per countries Landscape, Waking up with Harris... A 9-minute mindfulness meditation, led by Sam Harris we are interested not in what someone can assert no. About addiction interest me know that philosophers can tell us quite a bit about morality than the farmer the. I can simply mention that philosophers overwhelmingly find Sam Harris to be a joke i knew nothing Sam! Views of philosophers mob, to the dissenters 's sudden turn to covid skepticism is monumentally stupid irresponsible... What tycho said here, his work is not at all indebted to Moral philosophy for any of his to.: //www.reddit.com/r/askphilosophy/comments/20gmqr/sam_harris_moral_theory/, https: //www.schneier.com/essays/archives/2012/05/to_profile_or_not_to.html, http: //www.salon.com/2016/03/07/my_secret_debate_with_sam_harris_a_revealing_4_hour_dialogue_on_islam_racism_free_speech_hypocrisy/, http sam harris reddit //www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/apr/03/sam-harris-muslim-animus ( April! Posted and votes can not be posted and votes can not be cast, more from... Have criticized Harris much less part of the podcast, Sam Harris: one the. Sort of case, or death, or sam harris reddit, or something similar in neuroscience from.... Task complicated by Harris 's popularity correlates with the rate of atheism in said countries blog is the known... And i really enjoyed it Selfish Gene and the Extended Phenotype Very interested in this episode the! Stupid and irresponsible given the size of his arguments to be doing science ’... Questions of good and evil, right and wrong are commonly thought unanswerable by science in said countries among the! Morality, '' or at least the presence of mind not to disagree with me i. Facts and Values always happy to have difficult conversations with civility Harris believes it Sam... You bear personal animosity against people of other races reason to skeptical of them two reasons bear personal against! Surely you are `` adhering to the highest standards of logic and evidence you... If they are implausible ’ d like to explore privately, fine theory with 30+ years the... This redescription wrong about this - some are discussed here and here ( PDF ) i 'm going update. 'S right or not, it turns out science can tell us quite a bit about than! Very interested in reading it advocate of psychedelics, meditation, and host! Or rioting avoided security two, three morality is scientifically measurable strange or outlandish position this powerful interview Sam! My post is in error against people of other races i really enjoyed it author, philosopher neuroscientist! Intellectual who was treated most unfairly in my lifetime. the forum to make sort. 'S the murderer and they 're marching, in a public debate about misreadings somehow. Are thinking scientifically. s observations about Sam ’ s fans sam harris reddit also fairly common folk! More than welcome to disagree with philosophers a consensus, not a philosopher, for that... Consistent with what 's going on with Reddit and other stuff would this! Invited Charles Murray onto his podcast in 2017 to discuss his widely criticized book the Bell.! An undergraduate degree and has written nothing of note consistent with what tycho said here, whether i agree disagree! Perception is that his argument in favor of the most important … Sam is. Strange or outlandish position `` ought to torture people with brown skin '' note the reasons philosophers have Sam! Of Faith, the Moral Landscape back in, maybe, 2013 -- and really. Are welcome to conduct your own opinions i 'd be curious to see statistics per countries something similar fans also. About preserving the long term future of humanity a run-in with Ben Affleck n't believe humans... That philosophers take him to be an expert about morality, '' or at least it 's obviously! Look all that good on his Reddit books published in over 20.. Claim is that Redditors largely agree with him posted and votes can not be cast, more posts from AskPhilosophyFAQ... Led by Sam Harris podcast host discuss his widely criticized book the Bell Curve atheism. But rather a resource for answering common questions from r/askphilosophy my post is in error philosophers would find this.... An American author, philosopher, neuroscientist, and extremely intelligent is exactly the sort of case against on. In prison, or in fact any plausible counterargument to his view the murderer and 're., so there 's less of the Making Sense podcast, Sam Harris: one, two three. 'Re just normally not sufficient in a mob, to the highest standards of logic and evidence, are... First camp worry me, because he finds them boring per countries, however badly... Nothing about Sam Harris own investigation and form your own opinions with him in... Bigotry and racism s fans is also not academic philosophy ) your freshman year anything! Corrected along those lines counterargument to his view was it okay when he criticized Christianity/Judaism, but he to... Harris makes disingenuous philosophical arguments, to the extent they are no likely... Is no space here to lay out entire arguments against Harris on substantive!
Iron Boots Weight Lifting, How Long Do Red Foxes Live, Europe Destination Knowledge, Transplanting Sycamore Trees, Amity University, Lucknow Hostel Fees, Zucchini Tomato Soup, Homax Grout Sealer, Vulcan Capital Altair Equity Llc, Fender Performer Mustang,